Several
months ago two friends, one younger and Black, the other older and White, start talking about race. Both
women have PhDs and share a passion for science and a commitment to
diversity. The catalyst for this conversation was David Thomas’ “The Truth
About Mentoring Minorities:
Race Matters”, originally published in April 2001 by the
Harvard Business Review.
The conversation has been periodic, punctuated
by weeks (months?) of silence, but has remained focused on the
mentoring of doctoral candidates since we are concerned greatly
about graduate education. This is just the beginning and we are not able
to predict where the conversation will lead. Periodically, we will be sharing on the results of our conversations on each of our
blogs, FairerScience and iPhDgirl.
We thought we would start by writing a bit
about where we are coming from.
I (Pat) am a former college professor with a
strange hobby- I voluntarily read and critique dissertation
proposals and drafts for folks who haven’t been getting enough
guidance. Through the past 30 years I’ve read dissertations from a lot of
folks, and almost all of them have been white women or women and men of
color and I want to know why.
It’s easy to say racism or sexism or both but that’s simplistic and not helpful. I want Andrea and me to dig deeper and explore our own perspectives and those of
others- toward what is going on with good and bad cross-race mentoring in
graduate school.
I (Andrea) am a biophysicist by training and a
mischief-maker at heart.
Having left lab science for policy my career focus has shifted to facilitating the practice of science--and
people are at this heart of its practice. Academic science, in my
opinion, seems to have a talent management problem. My perspectives on and
interests in this topic are personal, intellectual, and professional. One
key area to explore is that of graduate recruitment and
"education". Why the focus on gender or race? Well, as a Black
female it is somewhat personal. By many measures attempts to achieve
diversity in the academic ranks has been a failure. But then
again, although I'm not an academic or a researcher, I don't feel that
I've failed. Moreover, I know that my educational outcome is indistinct from that
of so many doctoral students (regardless of race and gender). So
perhaps it's narcissism, perhaps it's intellectual curiosity, perhaps
it's determination to "make things right". Still, I need
to decide what significance I can take from my own experience, from that of
others, and from the data. As with everything in life, race does matter.
So does gender. But does it have to be a hindrance to anyone or a
roadblock to achievement?
We (Pat and Andrea) are looking forward for
our first “real” post and hope you will join the conversation.
No comments:
Post a Comment